The Tension in the North

Estimated Reading Time: 5 Minutes

By: Jens Bolstad

What would you do if someone with a potentially hostile character started hanging out in your neighbor’s yard every day and publicly stated they disliked your behavior? This scenario could represent the Russian view of US and NATO involvement in the Nordic countries over the last few years. After Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, the US and NATO expanded their military presence and increased their military investments in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. Russia most likely perceives the increased cooperation amongst the US, NATO, and the Nordic countries as an increasing western bias of balancing powers in Northern Europe. Further, the potential enlargement of NATO is viewed as a threat to Russia because it diminishes the current buffer zone between Russia and the NATO countries and attempts to downsize the Russian presence in its traditional sphere of influence. Overall, the increased tension between Russia and the Nordic countries has the potential to deteriorate regional security and stability.

The US is focusing on the Nordic countries through the presence of forces and military investments due to increased tensions with Russia in Northern Europe. In 2016, Norway agreed to host a small contingent of 330 US Marines (USMC) at Vaernes military base in the middle region of Norway. This decision was controversial due to Norway’s peacetime policy implemented in 1949, which prohibits the posting of foreign troops in Norway unless under attack or threat of an attack. However, the Norwegian government argued the USMC unit would change personnel every six months, therefore it was not permanent basing. Russia reacted promptly by saying this presence of foreign forces “makes Norway unpredictable, can increase excitement, push an arms race and lead to destabilization of the situation in Europe.” Russia further stated they regarded the act as “clearly unfriendly” and warned, “will not remain without consequences.”

In Sweden, 1,300 US troops participated alongside Swedish and NATO troops in Exercise Aurora in 2017. Since Sweden is not a part of NATO and is considered a neutral nation, the involvement of US and NATO forces in the exercise was a statement of deterrence against Russia. Furthermore, Sweden has participated in several US-led exercises and operations in Afghanistan and the Middle East and is a member of the Heavy Airlift Wing, a multinational military airlift capability initially led by the US to provide strategic airlift for NATO. Sweden also recently purchased the Patriot Missile Defense System for a little over $1 billion from Raytheon, a US company. Together with Sweden, Finland is bonding with the western alliance. In 2017, both nations signed a treaty to participate in the British led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF), a NATO force that can react to any hostile threat within a short timeframe. In the same year, President Trump met with the Finnish President, Sauli Niinistö, where Trump made clear the importance of protecting the Baltic Region against Russia. Russia, on the other hand, has made it clear through various sources that they disapprove of the collaboration between the Nordic countries and the US together with NATO.

Could the increasing ties between the US and NATO with Finland and Sweden eventually lead to a full NATO membership for the two countries? A NATO expansion to include Finland and Sweden, tied with a permanent presence of US troops in Norway, would be an ominous sign for Russia. Upon hearing about Sweden potentially becoming a NATO member, President Putin stated, “If Sweden joins NATO, it obviously will adversely affect our bilateral relations. For us, NATO means extending beyond our borders also from Swedish territory. We will have to consider what a suitable response would be, as it is another threat to Russia.” Furthermore, Putin explained in a meeting with the Finnish Prime minister in 2016 that he would respect Finland’s membership in NATO, but would take proper countermeasures by putting Russia’s forces closer to the Finnish border. The buffer zone between the East and the West has gradually diminished over the years. In 2004, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia became members of NATO, leaving only Sweden and Finland left as neutral countries in the North. As a result, Northern European countries’ relationships with Russia is becoming more unstable and contentious due to Russia feeling more threatened and both sides increased ability to wage war.

OTH, multi-domain operations, emerging security environment

Cold Response 2012 military exercise in Nordland, Norway. The yearly air land and maritime exercise is organized within NATO with a UN mandate.

The growing insecurity between Russia and the Nordic countries has aggravated the relationship between the nations. Historically, the dialogue between Russia and Norway has been good. However, since 2014, little official business has taken place between Russia and Norway on a political level even though there are several bilateral agreements in effect. Furthermore, there are several reports of increased Russian activity on Norwegian soil. State officials have been refused entry to Russia, and currently, an alleged Norwegian spy is in custody in Russia. In Sweden, there have been several reports of unidentified submarines along the Swedish coastline, a vast number of cyber-attacks have been executed of unknown origin, and Russian military planes have conducted numerous violations of Swedish airspace. Finland has experienced similar scenarios. The following statement by the Prime minister`s Office of Finland describes the deteriorating situation: “Military activity and military tensions have increased in the Baltic Sea region. The early-warning period for military crises has become shorter, and the threshold for using force has lowered. Finland must prepare for the use of military force, or threat thereof, against it.” Both Norway and Finland shares miles of border with Russia, on land and at sea,  meaning a healthy relationship and transparent political dialogue is essential to maintain a stable region.

Currently, it looks like the Nordic and Russian relationship is on a downward spiral with no apparent end state. Before the Russian annexation of Crimea, the relationship between the Nordic countries and Russia was stable and transparent. Since then, the US and NATO influence on the Nordic countries has grown steadily with the presence of Allied forces, bi-lateral agreements, and several joint operations. Russian officials have explicitly opposed this growing interaction and western influence with numerous threats and an increasing number of hostile acts. If the Nordic countries’ relationship and cooperation with NATO and the West continues, how will Russia respond? Sweden’s former Secretary of State and Foreign Affairs, Carl Bildt, stated that “it is likely that both Sweden and Finland are NATO members in ten years.” There is a saying that if you force a badger into a corner, eventually it will bite. In this case, let’s hope Russia is not the badger.

Major Jens Bolstad is a student at the United States Air Force Air Command and Staff College, He has previously worked as a C-130J pilot in The Royal Norwegian Air Force; Program Manager in the Norwegian Defense Materiel Agency; several tours at the Inspectorate of Air Operations; and as an instructor in the Saab Safari training Aircraft.   E-mail: surfejens@gmail.com

Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Air Force, the U.S. Government, the Norwegian Air Force, or the Norwegian Government.

OTH, multi-domain operations, emerging security environment

3 thoughts on “The Tension in the North

  • Pingback:The Tension in the North

  • February 6, 2019 at 7:47 pm
    Permalink

    I am an American living in Norway, where I have 2 young children, and I am deeply concerned by our overthrowing of The Nordic Balance policy of keeping Scandinavia de-militarized and the growing likelihood of Britain especially wanting to start its war with Russia up here.

    The intent seems to be to have a nuclear war with Russia up here, so that heavily populated and invested Central and Western Europe and Britain don’t become the radioactive wasteland – there is still contamination from Chernobyl in the central Norwegian mountains.

    Civil defense authority Per Brekke has publicly stated that there are fallout shelters – presumably unstocked with supplies, except for the elites – for only half of Norway’s population, and the radioactivity which washes over Norway … Putin has cited our missile subs hiding out in fjords and there will be huge clouds coming over from England … will be intense.

    We started this with our Kosovo bombing war of aggression – I exposed Appendix B of the Rambouillet Treaty in American academia on H-Diplo on 14May99, Henry Kissinger really blew the lid off it in the 31May99 Newsweek, and Sen. Don Nickles had already done so debating Lieberman’s and McCain’s war powers resolution at the start of May – which Putin cited as justification for Russia taking the Crimea.

    Kiev February 2014 was no spontaneous revolution. It was a carefully orchestrated coup led by the “architect” of our previous Libyan holocaust, Bernard-Henri Levy, and violence-escalated by *anti*-Yanukovich-government snipers – according to Ukraine heroine pilot Nadezhda Savchenko a year ago – killing 100 demonstrators. And our coup was timed to the Sochi Winter Olympics, to deter and delay Russian reaction.

    By contrast, when there was an equivalent (pro-Soviet) coup on strategic Grenada island within *our* inner security perimeter in October 1983, we retook the place militarily within a week.

    Our coup threatens the Russians with an “interventionist”/aggressor NATO all the way up to Kharkov at their throats, and the Russian people … having lost 27 million people in World War 2 … are deeply afraid. Some months ago at Valdai, Putin solemnly said Russians must be prepared to become martyrs and go to Heaven, to stop the West’s evil. They and he feel their backs are against the wall.

    A year ago, RAND testified to Congress that we may not be able to defeat *either* Russia or China in a (neoconservative) “major war,” and we have *stupidly* made military allies of both of them.

    The British are economically and demographically desperate and seem to have gone mad. They/we may start World War 3 up here, but it will become a global and nuclear holocaust in a flash.

    People must have personal face-to-face talks with their members of Parliament, to stop this … while there may still be time.

    Reply
    • February 6, 2019 at 7:55 pm
      Permalink

      I should have added that our Kiev coup broke our Budapest nonintervention-in-Ukraine peace treaty with the Russians. We are at war against them, and they know it.

      Reply

Leave a Reply